In a Malaysiakini report entitled Religious scholar dismisses khalwat proposal for non-Muslims, Syed Ali Tawfik Al-Attas, the head of the Malaysian Institute of Islamic Understanding, is quoted as saying “In Islam it says to you yours to us ours in terms of religion.” On the face of it, Syed Ali Tawfik Al-Attas, sounds like a very progressive and tolerant Muslim, but the reality of the matter is that in Malaysia there is no such freedom for the Muslim who has chosen to live Islam.
No person who was born into a Muslim family has the legal right to leave Islam. The case of Lina Joy, Kamariah Ali, and most recently that of Revathi Masoosai are just a few examples where there is no freedom of conscience and the right to practise one’s religion of choice for the Malays.
In Revathi Masoosai’s case her marriage to a Hindu man is not recognized because she was born a Muslim and her husband never converted to Islam. The law in Malaysia does not recognize the marriage between a Muslim and a non-Muslim.
Apostasy is viewed as a serious matter in Malaysia because racial identity and religion for the Malays are one and the same. To be a Malay means to be a Muslim. Hence, the fear among the Malays is that if apostasy is allowed, that means eventually there will no longer be Malays.
Malays who have left Islam and converted to Christianity for example, have to live a double life, and their new found religion kept a secret. If they are found to have left Islam they would be sent to a rehabilitation center like what happened to Kamariah Ali and Revathi Massoosai.
In Malaysia the Sharia law is meant to be applied to Muslims, but where does that leave the non-Muslim who has left Islam? Lina Joy insisted that the Sharia law was not applicable to her because she had left Islam, but that did not help her case at all. The Sharia Court is still the one to determine whether or not people like Lina Joy and Revathi Masoosai are Muslims or not.
As a Malaysian who values freedom of religion, I feel that the Constitution of Malaysia needs to be amended so that people can have the right, a real right, to practise the religion of their choice without fearing threats of detention, rehabilitation and threats of death hanging over their heads. And words like “You can’t at whim and fancy convert from one religion to another,” from a Federal Court Judge, a thing of the past.
Religion should be a personal matter between an individual and his/her God. And as such no apostasy law is ever going to stop a person from exercising his or her right to freedom of conscience.
Sphere: Related Content